KatharineD Proves that The Crucible is the Most Acclaimed London Play in Five Years

Responding to popular demand, guest blogger KatharineD looks back five years to compare The Crucible’s reception by critics to London productions over the past five years.  

 

As a follow up to yesterday’s post, comparing other play reviews to The Crucible, I decided to track back further, in the search for another play scoring six 5 star ratings in the major English press. Five years was the time period I set for the overall search, July 2009- 3rd July 2014.  Once again, The Guardian was the starting point- if Michael Billington gave a production 5 stars, I then cross-checked firstly with the highly respected reviewers from The Telegraph or The Independent to see if they matched.

There’s a good reason for Michael Billington’s reviews to be the one’s against which the others  be measured- he’s been The Guardian‘s drama critic since October 1971, a period of over forty years, and is Britain’s longest serving theatre critic, receiving an OBE in 2013 for services to the theatre. He’s written books about Peggy Ashcroft, Tom Stoppard, and Alan Ayckbourn, as well as critical studies on British theatre, and also teaches courses in theatre. Billington is the official authorised biographer of Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter, which was first published in 1996.

I picked up the search in 2013, working backwards, and thought I had a contender in Chimerica, a new play in May 2013 by Lucy Kirkwood, which won five Olivier Awards this year, including best new play. It scored a highly creditable four 5 stars and
two 4’s.
LastChanceToSeeCriticallyAcclaimedChimericaAtTheHaroldPinterTheatre
March 2012 began the run of the hit comedy, One Man, Two Guvnors, starring James Corden, well known as one of the original cast of The History Boys. It scored very highly also- four 5 stars, and two 4’s. In fairness I have to report that the play achieved a feat The Crucible failed to manage, namely a 5 star review from Quentin Letts at the Daily Mail.
1484345_10152146434195815_871321019_n
Arthur Miller seems to be generally well staged and received in London- All My Sons ran from May 2010, starring a high profile cast; David Suchet, Stephen Campbell Moore and Zoë Wanamaker, but could only manage two 5 stars and some 4’s.
images (6)
The search completed, I can report that there hasn’t been another play in the last five years to match the universal acclaim The Crucible received from the top six reviewers, the closest coming from this year’s other Arthur Miller staging, A View From The Bridge at the Young Vic.
images (7)

22 thoughts on “KatharineD Proves that The Crucible is the Most Acclaimed London Play in Five Years

  1. Thanks Katharine for your important research. I’m really happy The Crucible can be, today, considered the best reviewed London stage production. Quite impressive. Matching this ratings with audience reactions we can see from tweets, I think we can fairly conclude Farber installment is a triumph.

    Like

  2. That’s odd- the poster for Chimerica lists Time Out as one of the five star reviews, but I’ve seen the actual review and it was only awarded four stars, the same as from The Times.

    Like

  3. Bless your soul, Katharine! Though we feel in our hearts, as fans of RIchard’s, that this is an exceptional production , it is so gratifying to have evidence in black and white, of just that. Thanks for taking the time to compile this info. I swear, my heart bursts daily (hourly?) in response to something written, or posted, about this play, and particularly Richard’s part in it.

    Like

  4. Thank you so much for this great research! Now we can see just how well it’s done with the critics; and looking at my Twitter TL last night, with accolades steadily coming in I was revelling in how well accepted it is by the audience. We couldn’t have wished for a more spectacular return to the stage for RA!

    Like

    • I keep thinking I must’ve missed something- can’t quite believe the results, to be honest. Just amazing, really. The tweets make great reading- love those instant impressions.

      Like

  5. Just three questions concerning your research:
    Who are your 6 top reviewers/papers? Are they the same for all productions you compared? And where did you find the star ratings? (Concerning your mention that the stars on the Chimerica poster is different). Thanks. And my restpect for doing a research like this!

    Like

    • Thanks for the questions- the top six reviews come from The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, The Times,The Evening Standard and Time Out, with the first four being the most important in my opinion. I used these six print outlets to check each play against, but usually I didn’t gave to go far past the first three before I came to a four star review, which automatically dropped it out of contention.
      If you google ‘Guardian Michael Billington reviews’, it takes you to a listing of all his reviews in chronological order, with the star rating right there, so that was straightforward. To cross check, I googled the name of the play, the year (some plays like Shakespearean one’s get performed so frequently you need to ensure you’re checking the right one), and ‘reviews’. That was usually enough to bring up a couple more of the important reviews- some required further digging. The main problem was The Times, due to it’s paywall- if I found a play with lots of five stars like Chimerica, the only way to find The Times rating was to search for a review round up, or a website for the play itself, where they often list their best rated reviews for publicity purposes. Not all plays have this though.
      Some plays start in the provinces and then move to the West End, and can be reviewed twice, not always with the same rating. If you google ‘Chimerica’ and ‘Time Out’ the review is definitely four stars, not five. That play poster lists a number of other media outlets, not all of which have reviewed The Crucible yet, as far as I’m aware, but they’re not as significant as the six I listed.

      Like

  6. thankyou for doing the research ,its nice to know its official , and , what we have always known ,Richard Armitage is a great actor not just some “beefcake “..(makes my blood boil when people assume we are fans just because of his looks.)

    Like

    • It’s terrific for the whole cast and crew, to be forever associated with such a critically successful production, and RA is certainly an important part of that.

      Like

  7. Thank you for your research,Katharine, what an awesome return to the boards for Richard. I’m so pleased for him and all concerned with the production, it’s particularly gratifying given the hard work they put into their performances night after night.

    Like

    • I’m sure you’ve been following along just as closely as I have Mezz, from our vast distance! They certainly do work hard, including all that physical effort involved. Two shows today…

      Like

  8. Thanks Katherine for the detailed answers. I actually answered one question myself: there was a 5 star review of Chinerica for the run at the Almeida theatre by a different reviewer from Time Out – the one who also reviewed The Crucible- which was 5 Stars – so the poster is right. The Times review was for the same venue, I think there was none for the Westend transfer, instead one by the Sunday Times with 5 Stars which makes Chimerica as successful as The Crucible the six paper-review-wise in my opinion.

    Like

  9. Pingback: Anonymous

Leave a comment